A coalition of conservative groups lead by the Koch-affiliated American Energy Alliance (and including the Koch-affiliated Americans for Prosperity, the Koch-affiliated Competitive Enterprise Institute, among others) are showing up in force against renewable energy, urging congressional Republicans to allow a key wind energy tax credit to expire.
Wind power’s Achilles heel, for the time being, is that it’s not yet sustainable on its own — without tax credits, it collapses.
According to the American Wind Energy Association, capacity and construction drop a full 84 percent when the wind production tax credit (PTC) isn’t available. In a letter addressed to House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), the groups warn that Democrats will try to extend the PTC during the lame-duck session. Forget that doing so will save jobs and promote clean energy, they argue: cooperating would be tantamount to endorsing climate action.
“Rejecting efforts to extend the PTC is a meaningful way for this Congress to oppose the president’s climate plan,” the letter reads. “A vote for extending the PTC is a vote for the president and the majority leader’s agenda.”
The incredibly duplicitous thing about this is the way the groups spin wind energy into a climate change issue, when in reality, it’s much simpler than that — and something that, unlike the EPA’s power plant rule, has bipartisan support. Bush Last March, 144 Congressional members, lead by Sens. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Reps. Steve King (R-Iowa) and Dave Loebsack (D-Iowa) called for the PTC’s renewal (wind power contributes over 27 percent to Iowa’s energy mix, while Colorado’s home to major wind turbine manufacturers). Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, a Republican, once wrote a letter to the Wall Street Journal calling them out for trying to politicize the PTC, when in reality, he argued, the wind industry is “an American success story that is helping us build our manufacturing base, create jobs, lower energy costs and strengthen our energy security” — not, as the AEA letter reads, “an attack on affordable energy from gas, coal and nuclear.”