Our best science consistently demonstrates that greenhouse gas emissions from our energy usage pose the largest environmental threat to both humans and wildlife. Of course, once built, wind energy provides an emissions-free source of electricity. But the most widely accepted measure of determining the impact of energy production is tracking the “lifecycle,” or “cradle-to-grave,” environmental impacts.
To definitively determine which energy production method has the least lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, the National Renewable Energy Lab recently completed a comprehensive review of all the literature on the topic. The results were clear: wind energy‘s lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions are a few percent of those of fossil fuels, lower than nuclear, and even lower than nearly all other renewable energy resources.
Also, by typically offsetting energy production from the most expensive, least efficient energy source on the utility grid--usually a fossil fuel source--wind power reduces other harmful air pollutants such as mercury and the precursors to smog and acid rain.
Even better, wind energy also has by far the lowest impact on wildlife and their habitats when compared to traditional energy sources, according to an exhaustive cradle-to-grave analysis conducted on behalf of the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority.
And since there is no need to use water to generate electricity from wind, wind power helps the arid regions of our country conserve their water supplies.
Clean is a popular label for good reason. But as the facts show, wind power can deservedly stake its claim as the most readily-scalable source of clean energy available today. And by helping reduce pollution, lower consumer energy costs, and revitalizing American manufacturing, wind power is truly clean, affordable, and homegrown.